Juan Thompson, Arrested For 8 Copycat JCC Bomb Threats, Is Disgraced Reporter, Fired For Fabricating Stories

31 year old Juan Thompson has been arrested in connection with 8 bomb threats against Jewish targets. Authorities do not believe he is responsible for dozens of others. Thompson seems to have made the threats in an effort to frame his ex-girlfriend.

This is not Thompson’s first flirtation with fantasy. In 2016 he was fired by the Intercept after it came out that he had repeatedly fabricated quotes and stories. Of particular impact, he had published a quote from a “Scott Roof” who he claimed was a cousin of white supremacist terrorist Dylann Roof:

Shortly before Reedâ€ s post, The Intercept prepended lengthy editorâ€ s notes to five of Thompsonâ€ s prior articles. Four of the notes amount to severe corrections; the fifth, attached to an article containing quotes attributed to a cousin of the white supremacist Dylann Roof, indicates a total retraction: “After speaking with two members of Dylann Roofâ€ s family, The Intercept can no longer stand by the premise of this story. Both individuals said that they do not know of a cousin named Scott Roof.â€

In the now-retracted article, Thompson had claimed that “Scott Roofâ€ had speculated during a phone conversation that Dylann Roof may been driven to murder nine black churchgoers at a Charleston, South Carolina church because “he kind of went over the edge when a girl he liked starting dating a black guy two years back.â€ Thompsonâ€ s report was picked up by dozens of other news outlets.

Gawker features a bizarre string of emails from Thompson, who claims, among other things, to be undergoing cancer treatment.

Ms. Reed:

Iâ€ ve been undergoing radiation treatment for testicular cancer and, since I no longer have health insurance, Iâ€ ve been feverishly struggling and figuring out how to pay for my treatment. All of this, of course, has taken up my time and energy; except for the few moments Iâ€ ve spent searching for some relief.

With regards to verifying the comments, Iâ€ m in STL undergoing treatment, again, and not in NY, thus I lack access to my notebooks (which I took for most stories) to address these matters. Moreover, after finally looking over the notes sent to me, I must say this: I had a habit of writing drafts of stories, placing the names of ppl I wanted to get quotes from in there, and then going to fetch the quotes.

(Was it sloppy? Yes? But Iâ€ m a cub reporter and expected a sustained and competent editor to guide me, something which I never had at your company and something with which The Intercept continues to struggle as everyone in this business knows.)

But, I digress; back to the situation before us.

If I couldnâ€ t obtain a quote from the person I wanted, I went somewhere else, and mustâ€ ve forgot to change the names—clearly. Also, yes I encouraged some of my interviewees to use another name; theyâ€ re poor black people who didnâ€ t want their names in the public given the situations and that was the only was of convincing them otherwise. That also explains why some of them didnâ€ t want to talk with your companyâ€ s research team or denied the events. These werenâ€ t articles in Harpers or The Nation. Instead, these are the lives of people forgotten by society and their being in public and talking to white, NY people, no less, could harm and turn them off. Theyâ€ ve lost loved ones to violence you and others couldnâ€ t possibly imagine.

Ultimately, the journalism that covers the experiences of poor black folk and the journalism others, such as you and First Look, are used to differs drastically. This dilemma is the Great Problem with the white media organizations that dominate our media landscape. As Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote: “The standard [white] progressive approach of the moment is to mix color-conscious moral invective with color-blind public policy.â€ Such an approach ignores the differences in the way we must navigate these various fields: including journalism.

The comments from editors calling me a stray dog; the lower pay; the being told on a trip to DC that I “shouldnâ€ t spend like itâ€ s the first of the monthâ€. I shrugged it all off.

I hope you and your company can understand all this and give me time to recover so that I may eventually look over my notes. I must say, though, itâ€ s a very nefarious and ill liberal and anti humanist position to take if you do otherwise: kicking a cancer patient when heâ€ s down. Iâ€ ve been through a lot tougher situations than this and will weather anything thrown my way.

Ms. Reed, I also just read Counsel Oberlanderâ€ s letter. Iâ€ m not in NY and have been sick and bed-ridden from radiation so of course I canâ€ t return that laptop—that I also broke by the way. But if your company wishes to withhold my separation pay, which I was banking on for my treatment, go right ahead. Iâ€ m also owed reimbursement from the trip to DC which I havenâ€ t received. But Iâ€ m not angry because, naturally, I didnâ€ t bring this up because my focus is on much more important things.

Juan Thompson

Clearly, Thompson is delusional, and this is unfortunate. His copycat crimes will distract attention from the real culprit and lend credence to the alt right canard that the recent rise in antisemitism is a “false flag”.